|
Developing the Product Mix and Output
Algorithm
Nine Common Approaches
Introduction
The approaches
have been developed to help demonstrate how the PMOA can be applied in
the most common situations.
It is not mandatory to use one of the common
approaches (CA’s), however, by using one or more of the CA’s, it should
be:
- easier for you to prepare a submission
to DEFRA;
- easier for DEFRA to review your submission;
- more likely that your submission will
be approved quickly;
- easier for the discount scheme to
help.
The CA’s developed by the
discount scheme are:
|
Common Approach
1
|
Single Product,
Single Regression
|
|
Common Approach
2
|
Mixed Product,
Multiple Regression
|
|
Common Approach
3
|
Mixed Product,
Non-Coinciding
|
|
Common Approach
4
|
Mixed Product,
Complex Production
|
|
Common Approach
5
|
Specific Event,
with Sub-Meters
|
|
Common Approach
6
|
Specific Event,
without Sub-Meters
|
|
Common Approach
7
|
Introduction
of a New Product
|
|
Common Approach
8
|
Discontinuation
of a Product
|
|
Common Approach
9
|
Incorporating
Non-production Related Variables, e.g. degree days
|
Together with the methodology
described for each CA, dummy submission documents have been prepared
to demonstrate how each CA can be used in your pre-approval document.
The aim of the PMOA is to
allow you to adjust your target to take into account a change of circumstances.
The methodology described for each common approach, describes how your
target should be adjusted using the data for your milestone year, e.g.
energy use and production data. The pre-approval documents should demonstrate
how you propose to adjust your target when your milestone year data becomes
available.
This document should be read
in conjunction with "Applying the PMOA – Two Simple Examples"
and the dummy submission documents.
Common Approach
1 – Single Product, Single Regression
|
General Characteristics:
|
Only one product made at the site.
Output has decreased since the base
year.
No other influencing factors (such
as weather for example).
|
|
Data Requirements:
|
Main utility meters and production
information:
|
|
Methodology:
|
For regular data points
obtained during the base year, see PMOA Simple Example 1A.
For regular data points
obtained during a more recent period, see PMOA Simple Example 1B.
|
|
Possible Problems:
|
If you obtain a poor
correlation it could be because there is really more than one product
type, or there is a non-production related variable which influences
energy use and should be taken into account (e.g. weather).
Check the consistency
of your data, has the energy and production data been collected
for exactly the same period, have any readings been miss-read?
|
Common Approach
2 – Mixed Product, Multiple Regression
| General Characteristics: |
More than one product type or influencing
variable
|
| Data Requirements: |
Main utility meters and production
information:
- annual production data for each
production type and annual data for each energy source for both
the Base Year and Target Year;
- regular data points (e.g. weekly)
collected during either the base year or during a more recent
period. Need a minimum of 25 data point
|
| Methodology: |
For regular data points
obtained during the base year, see PMOA Simple Example 2A.
For regular data points
obtained during a more recent period, see PMOA Simple Example 2B
|
| Possible Problems: |
If you obtain a poor
correlation it could be because there are too many or too few product
types, or there is a non-production related variable which influences
energy use that has not been taken into account (e.g. weather).
Check the consistency
of your data, has the energy and production data been collected
for exactly the same period, have any readings been miss-read?
Consider another
approach if still achieve poor correlation
|
Common Approach
3 – Mixed Product, Non-Coinciding
|
General Characteristics:
|
Two or more
products
Only one product
made at any given time
Usually, same
equipment used for all product types
Two types of
production cycle:
long cycle
variations:
e.g.
seasonal products like frozen vegetables, weekly data can be split
into groups for each product type
short cycle
variations:
e.g.
different recipes made for a few hours or days, need to set-up
data collection at a suitably short interval, may be best to do
a short data collection campaign to evaluate energy and production
relationship
|
|
Data
Requirements:
|
Main
utility meters and production information:
- annual production data for each
production type and annual data for each energy source for both
the Base Year and Target Year
- regular data points (at a frequency
suitable to the production cycle) collected during either the
base year or during a more recent period when all products are
being manufactured
- data outlining production changes,
e.g. dates/times of production of each product
|
|
Methodology:
|
Identify
the energy use of each product and undertake a linear regression
as shown in Simple Example 1 for each product type
|
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection accuracy,
non-production related influencing variables should be incorporated
(in this case a multiple regression analysis should be done for this
product type instead of a linear regression) |
Common Approach
4 – Mixed Product, Complex Production
|
General Characteristics:
|
Numerous product
types
Common Approach
2 gives poor correlation
|
|
Data
Requirements:
|
Assessment of energy use of different
production lines is essential.
Use sub-meters
if available.
Where sub-meters
are not available other forms of analysis will be required, e.g.
theoretical energy use
|
|
Methodology:
|
Regression analysis of sub-metered
data (Simple Example 2).
Theoretical calculations
based on product specifications.
Corrections for
operating hours.
Corrections for
degree days.
Spot check data.
|
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection
accuracy, correct statistical analysis of data. Correct definition
of variables. |
Please note that no dummy
submission document has been prepared for this common approach since all
sites following this methodology will be in different situations.
Common Approach
5 – Specific Event, with Sub-Meters
|
General
Characteristics:
|
A one-off change that occurs to the
process
- e.g. an extra processing step is
added
Many regulatory/relevant constraints
can be demonstrated following this approach
|
|
Data
Requirements:
|
Main
utility meters and production information:
- annual production data for production
and energy for both the Base Year and Target Year;
- data from the sub-meter(s) on the
new process to demonstrate extra energy use;
- data outlining changes, e.g. dates/times
of installation of new proces
|
|
Methodology:
|
Calculate adjusted base year SEC as
if new processing step had been operating, e.g:
SEC adjusted
base year = SEC base year
+ SEC new process
Calculate the adjusted
first milestone target using the adjusted base year SEC
|
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection
accuracy, availability of sub-metered data. Correct definition of
variables |
Common Approach
6 – Specific Event, without Sub-Meters
| General Characteristics: |
Identical to Common Approach
5 except without sub-meters |
| Data Requirements: |
Main utility meters and production
information:
- annual production data for production
and energy for both the Base Year and Target Year;
- theoretical calculations to support
data analysis;
- data outlining changes, e.g. dates/times
of installation of new process
|
| Methodology: |
Carry out a regression
analysis of energy and production data before and the process change
to identify the impact of the step change.
Use CUSUM technique
if appropriate (see Good Practice Guide 112 from the Energy Efficiency
Best Practice Program).
Calculate adjusted
base year SEC and adjusted milestone target
. |
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection accuracy
and statistical analysis. Correct definition of variables |
Common Approach
7 – Introduction of a New Product
|
General
Characteristics:
|
New
product has been brought on-line since the base year
|
|
Data
Requirements:
|
Main
utility meters and production information:
- annual production data for each
production type and annual data for each energy source for both
the Base Year and Target Year;
- regular data points (e.g. weekly)
collected during a recent period. Regular data collected
for the base year is not applicable since the new product was
not made during the base year. Need a minimum of 25 data point
|
|
Methodology:
|
Data
collection and analysis as PMOA Simple Example 2B, except the production
value of the new product for the base year will be zero
|
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection accuracy
and statistical analysis. Correct definition of variables |
Common Approach
8 – Discontinuation of a Product
|
General Characteristics:
|
A product has
stopped being manufactured since the base year
|
|
Data Requirements:
|
Main utility
meters and production information:
- annual production
data for each production type and annual data for each energy
source for both the Base Year and Target Year;
- regular data
points (e.g. monthly or weekly) collected during the base year.
Regular data collected for a recent period is not applicable since
the discontinued product has not been made during this period.
- theoretical
calculations to support data analysis
|
|
Methodology:
|
Data
collection and analysis as PMOA Simple Example 2A on base year data.
Since accuracy and frequency of this data may be poor, use theoretical
calculations to support energy consumption of the discontinued product
|
| Possible Problems: |
Availability of monthly
or weekly base year data, or information to support theoretical calculations |
Common Approach
9 – Incorporating Non-Production Related Variables,
e.g. degree days
|
General Characteristics:
|
Factors other
than production significantly influence energy use
|
|
Data Requirements:
|
Main utility
meters and production information:
- annual production data for each
production type and annual data for each energy source for both
the Base Year and Target Year;
- regular data points (e.g. weekly)
collected during the base year or a recent period. Need a minimum
of 25 data points
Data for the non-production related
variable:
- an annual value for the non-production
related variable for the Base Year and Target Year;
- regular data points gathered at
the same interval and period as the energy and production data
Examples of non-production related
variables include:
|
|
Methodology:
|
Data
collection and analysis as PMOA Simple Example 2A or 2B depending
upon when the regular data was collected. The influencing variable
is treated in the same way as a production value in the analysis
|
| Possible Problems: |
Data collection accuracy
and statistical analysis. Correct definition of production and non-production
variables |
.
.
|